NYTimes: Meet the Life Hackers
Does this resonate with anyone?
****
A study by University of California at Irvine researcher Gloria Mark finds that modern, high-tech office workers are frustrated by the many interruptions they regularly encounter in their daily grind; yet these interruptions, ironically enough, are critical to their jobs. In the emerging field of interruption science, researchers are trying to determine the best times and ways to interrupt the office worker so that the drawbacks of such distractions are minimized and the benefits maximized. The average worker does not return to the task he or she was doing prior to an interruption for 25 minutes after the distraction, a behavior partly attributed to the worker's constant shifting between multiple windows on the computer screen. Research shows that 40 percent of the time, workers ramble along a different tangent when an interruption ends because their short-term memory has been disrupted. An experiment conducted by Microsoft Research Labs' Mary Czerwinski demonstrated that workers perform more efficiently and recall things better when working with large-screen computers, and her team subsequently created tools that group documents and programs together to maximize screen space; another experiment yielded a tiny circular window that floats on one side of the screen, with moving dots representing important information to keep track of. Research by technology writer Danny O'Brien has shown that some of the most productive workers use single documents or emails as repositories for the most pressing tasks they have to do and data they need to remember. Meanwhile, Microsoft Research Lab researcher Eric Horvitz has spent the last eight years devising networks with artificial intelligence that monitor a computer user's behavior and attempt to predict future actions so that a optimal time for interruption can be determined.
To view the full article: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/16/magazine/16guru.html
(Access to this site is free; however, first-time visitors must register.)
****
A study by University of California at Irvine researcher Gloria Mark finds that modern, high-tech office workers are frustrated by the many interruptions they regularly encounter in their daily grind; yet these interruptions, ironically enough, are critical to their jobs. In the emerging field of interruption science, researchers are trying to determine the best times and ways to interrupt the office worker so that the drawbacks of such distractions are minimized and the benefits maximized. The average worker does not return to the task he or she was doing prior to an interruption for 25 minutes after the distraction, a behavior partly attributed to the worker's constant shifting between multiple windows on the computer screen. Research shows that 40 percent of the time, workers ramble along a different tangent when an interruption ends because their short-term memory has been disrupted. An experiment conducted by Microsoft Research Labs' Mary Czerwinski demonstrated that workers perform more efficiently and recall things better when working with large-screen computers, and her team subsequently created tools that group documents and programs together to maximize screen space; another experiment yielded a tiny circular window that floats on one side of the screen, with moving dots representing important information to keep track of. Research by technology writer Danny O'Brien has shown that some of the most productive workers use single documents or emails as repositories for the most pressing tasks they have to do and data they need to remember. Meanwhile, Microsoft Research Lab researcher Eric Horvitz has spent the last eight years devising networks with artificial intelligence that monitor a computer user's behavior and attempt to predict future actions so that a optimal time for interruption can be determined.
To view the full article: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/16/magazine/16guru.html
(Access to this site is free; however, first-time visitors must register.)