http://www.npr.org/blogs/ablogsupreme/2009/06/300_grand_14000_records_diana_1.html?ft=1&f=104014555--Defending Diana Krall: Or less defending than acknowledging her less-than-stellar reputation among certain jazz crowds, and then giving her an honest appraisal of a Carnegie Hall performance -- which happened to be good. So says Nate Chinen at The Gig, as does Stephen Holden for the Times. There's something that could be read as backhanded about both reviews; it's the technique of saying "well, she isn't one of the greats, but she does these certain things competently, if not pleasantly." ("On one level, Ms. Krall is a middle-of-the-road pop-jazz diva," Holden writes; "She isn't at all a bad piano player, in a retrograde fashion," quoth Chinen.) In other words, the insult of diminished expectations. I don't think Holden and Chinen meant it that way, though; I think they genuinely enjoyed the performance and found interesting things happening in the music. But are Krall's enjoyable qualities relevant and important things to what jazz is and should be? That's not necessarily a fair question for a reviewer, though I'm still left frustrated that it's left incompletely explored.
Anyway, I've recently learned that host Steve Inskeep of Morning Edition just taped an interview with Krall while she came through the D.C. area. Makes me curious what sort of insights we'll get from her; we jazz people tend to view everything about her from our own biased perspectives. I'll be working on producing an extended cut for the Web -- I'm told it was "good tape," as we say here. So look for that -- or look to ignore that, if you aren't convinced of her artistic worth.